Gravity has been recognized to be one of the fundamental forces of nature for a long time and is a subtle pull that keeps galaxies from separation and planets orbiting. But what if it’s not a force?

These ideas don’t prove we’re living in a simulation. However, they do present compelling clues that we live in a simulation. After all, gravity remains one of the biggest mysteries in physics.

Recursia Studio Free on Github The same math that explains why you're aware also explains why gravity bends spacetime and why quantum part ...

Gravity may not be a fundamental force of nature, ... —but one that is based in physics and evidence that the universe appears to be operating suspiciously like a computer simulation.

Gravity May Be Key Evidence That Our Universe Is a Simulation, Groundbreaking New Research Suggests If it’s true, this work could have ramifications for some of the biggest mysteries of the ...

We have long taken it for granted that gravity is one of the basic forces of nature—one of the invisible threads that keeps the universe stitched together. But suppose that this is not true.

Physicist Melvin Vopson offered a new interpretation of gravity, arguing that it could be evidence that reality is a computer simulation.

A neutron star's final moments may spark violent starquakes, monster shock waves, and even a fleeting, never-before-seen object called a black hole pulsar.

In his new paper, Vopson focuses on gravity. Like with biological systems and symmetries, he proposes that gravity could be a way the universe minimizes information, and saves on computational power.