The aggravating prior authorization process includes one step that merits scrutiny and potentially regulatory action: the ...
If journals reject papers due to review shortages, the peer review process itself becomes compromised.
Peer review is a process by which students are asked to look at other students' work and provide feedback. While most commonly used for writing assignments, peer review can be used for any project or ...
Xiv.org has to defend itself against AI slop and fake studies. In the future, review articles and position papers will have ...
On March 6, 2025, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within ...
As the Trump administration slashes and transforms the National Institutes of Health (NIH), minority health researchers are ...
The AICPA A&A Focus Series webcast on Nov. 13, brought together leading voices in accounting, auditing, and assurance to discuss current developments and industry challenges. Hosted by Bob Durak, CPA, ...
Have you considered how the peer review process will work under the new quality management standards that firms providing audit and accounting services should implement by Dec. 15, 2025? The AICPA ...
After an editorial assessment of the manuscripts, manuscripts can either be rejected by the editors or sent ‘out to review’ (OTR) for expert assessment by peer reviewers. Articles are sent OTR at a ...
Editor’s Note: Previously, this series on scholarly publishing has offered advice on approaching an editor, getting a book contract, and writing a “timely” book. Peer review can be stressful, even for ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback